Category Archives: Chinese Head Tax issues + Gim Wong's Ride for Redress

Vancouver Sun: Where Harper Falls Short – article about failed promises

Vancouver Sun: Where Harper Falls Short – article about failed promises

image
Octogenarian Gim Wong thinks that Prime Minister Harper should give cheques to the families of
each of the more than
80,000 Chinese head tax certificates… even if their original head tax
payers and spouses died before the Conservative promise was made. –
photo Todd Wong

The Vancouver Sun published a story on Saturday, March 24th titled Where Harper Falls Short.

Peter
O'Neil's article is aimed primarily at how the Harper governent has not
addressed the party's election promises.  In particular, the
article also focusses on the ethnic issues of Chinese head tax, First
Nations fisheries and Air India inquiry, as well as leaky condos and
BC's under-representation in Parliament.

Octogenarian WW2 veteran Gim Wong is quoted as saying that
the “Harper government's apology and redress package involving
$20,000 cheques which went to surviving head tax
payers or their surviving widows of payers, was a 'huge'
breakthrough.”

“But that's just the first step,” he said, stressing that $20,000
cheques should go to the families of each of the more than 80,000
Chinese immigrants who paid the charge imposed between 1885 and 1923.

Gim
should know.  Gim has been a staunch advocate for head tax apology
and repayment, and was there to witness his friend Charlie Quon receive
the very first head tax ex-gratia payment from Canadian Heritage
Minister Bev Oda.  But Gim will not receive a payment for his
father's head tax certificate, because both his parent's are
predeceased, even though Gim had to live through the enduring hardship
while his father worked hard to repay money borrowed to pay the $500
head tax, prior to 1923.

Sid Tan who accompanied Gim on his first
motorcycle “Ride for Redress” to Craiglelachie, BC, site of  “the
last spike.” has written the following letter to the Vancouver Sun,
stating that Harper's promise to reconcile the head tax issue is still
unfinished. 

Where Harper Falls Short.
 

Re: Where Harper Falls Short
      Peter O'Neil, March 24, 2007
 
Dear Editor.
 
It is incorrect and misleading to state Prime Minister Stephen
Harper fulfilled the promise: “Apologize and provide financial redress
for victims of racist Canadian laws aimed at Chinese immigrants.”
 
What the Conservative government did was apologize and provide
financial redress to 0.6 of one percent of over 82,000 head tax
families. That would be ex gratia payments of $20,000 to approximately
500 surviving head tax payers and spouses of deceased head tax payers.
 
Sons and daughters, many of them now elderly, of deceased head tax
payers were also victims of government legislation (1885-1947) to
financially punish and separate Chinese families. Many of them excluded
by the government's unilaterally imposed so-called settlement continue
to seek justice and honour for pioneer families.
 
The PM's advisers have shown great political acumen and finesse in
this matter by garnering photo-ops and pandering for votes. While not
exactly promise broken, their appalling message to the excluded
families is, “We were wrong. We are sorry. We will keep the money. Too
bad your father and mother didn't live long enough. Take it or leave
it.”
 
Of course some head tax families will take it. But not the over
four thousand and growing represented by our Society, the Chinese
Canadian National Council and redress seeking groups from coast to
coast to coast. We say it ain't over until we say it's over. We say it
ain't over.
 
Now with rights and the vote, these head tax families have built a
movement to outlast the Harper government and those following should a
just and honourable redress not be forthcoming. We are seeking what any
Canadian would want – refund of an unjust tax.   
 
Simply put, the redress is incomplete. The government must
recognize all head tax families are equal and begin good faith
negotiations with their representatives. 
 
Yours sincerely,
Sid Chow Tan. co-chairperson
Head Tax Families Society

Here is the Vancouver Sun article below:

Where Harper Falls Short

Unfilled election campaign commitments aimed at B.C.:
Boosting parliamentary representation, ending racially divided fisheries, leaky
condo probe

 

Peter O'Neil

Vancouver Su


Saturday, March 24, 2007

OTTAWA – The
spirits of British Columbians Leslie Budden, Carmen Maretic, Perviz Madon and Gim Wong rose in 2006 when
a newly-elected Conservative government took power armed with an unusually
robust series of B.C.-focused campaign commitments.

The
four British Columbians had long advocated for action on issues that might have
best been directed to the Apostle Jude, Christianity's patron saint of lost
causes: B.C.'s $1.5 billion leaky condo crisis; the Chinese head tax redress
issue; the quest for truth if not justice in the 1985 Air India terror
bombings; the so-called “race-based” rights controversy in fishing
communities.

All
were files that had languished for years if not decades.

Today,
as Prime Minister Stephen Harper prepares for a possible spring election, he is
facing a reckoning over the dramatic pledges that surprised many political
observers when they were delivered on a sleepy Saturday morning in
Victoria during the 2006
campaign.

Harper,
anxious to secure a B.C. political breakthrough he felt crucial to winning
government, took a calculated gamble that not only copied a successful B.C.
Liberal strategy from the 2004 election campaign — but drastically increased
the stakes.

While
the Liberals scored political points with a platform-style “Made in
B.C.” campaign in the 2004 election, Paul Martin's promises for the West
Coast
were for the most part dominated by political platitudes.

Armed
with policy ideas from close to two dozen MPs who had spent years cooling their
heels in opposition, Harper produced an almost breathtaking “Stand Up For B.C.” platform with far more dramatic pledges than
Liberals or New Democrats pondered.

Only
Quebec , which
unlike B.C. rewarded Harper with more seats rather than fewer, warranted its
own region-specific agenda.

He
moved quickly on many, striking an Air India judicial inquiry, cancelling the
controversial Liberal privatization of a strategic port facility in
Prince Rupert , and
providing an apology and compensation to surviving head taxpayers or the widows
of those victimized by the racist tariff put on Chinese immigrants before 1923.

But
Harper has thus far fallen short on some of the more daring commitments,
including the pledge to boost B.C.'s representation in Parliament, his
post-election vow to end the policy of “racially-divided” fisheries,
and his promise to hold an inquiry into possible federal culpability in the
leaky condo crisis.

Maretic, an advocate for leaky condo
owners, has prepared a tough letter after shedding tears here last month while
meeting with Human Resources Minister Monte Solberg, who is responsible for the
Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp.

She
was frustrated that the Tory government, despite promising an inquiry, followed
the position of previous Liberal governments by saying it could say or do
nothing that might imply culpability. The government is facing several lawsuits
in B.C. courts.

“You
are aware of the toll this has taken particularly on our most vulnerable
citizens — single parents, young families, low income earners, disabled people
and seniors,” she wrote in a letter provided to The Vancouver Sun.

“The
outstanding question is whether your government will call the promised review
or state frankly that it has no intention to do so before an election is
called.”

Budden, 41, also fights back tears as she
voices frustration over the Harper government's refusal to shift gears from the
approach taken by successive governments since 1992 allowing separate,
native-only commercial fishing openings.

A
member of the Steveston fishing community, she has
struggled to make a living in the industry with her fisherman husband Glenn.

But
the issue goes deeper. Both her parents were Japanese-Canadians interned during
the Second World War. Her grandfather, Rintaro
Hayashi, was a Japanese-Canadian fisherman who fought against federal laws in
the mid-1920s that sought to reduce the number of “oriental”
fishermen.

One
law allowed only whites and aboriginal Canadians to use motorboats.

The
Conservative party was committed during the 2004 election to “equality of
all Canadians” in the commercial fisheries. While nothing was promised by
Harper in the 2006 campaign, he sent a letter to a
Calgary newspaper after the election
declaring that his government would oppose the “racially divided”
West Coast fishery.

“When
that statement came out I was ecstatic, I thought it meant they were actually
going to hold true to their word,” Budden
recalled this week.

“I
sent a letter saying how much it meant to us as a family. We thought they were
going to be different.

“Of
course, it hasn't turned out that way.”

The
Tory government, despite public statements saying Harper meant what he said,
has gone on to initial several treaties entrenching exclusive aboriginal
fishing rights. Indian Affairs Minister Jim Prentice has since defended the
government's policy as consistent with the Harper declaration, although Budden isn't buying it.

She
said her late grandfather is probably “rolling in his grave” at the
government's position.

“I
just really believe in my heart that we've failed him, failed what he fought
for and stood for.”

While
the Tory government has fulfilled many of the commitments, by striking an Air
India Inquiry and compensating Chinese head taxpayers, other unfulfilled
commitments hang like a heavy cloud over the government as it contemplates a
possible spring election.

They
include the pledge to end B.C.'s under-representation in Parliament, the
promise to strike a judicial inquiries into the
Fraser River
fishery, and the commitment to probe possible federal culpability in B.C.'s
$1.5-billion leaky condo crisis.

Both
Madon, whose husband died in the Air India bombing,
and Wong, whose parents paid the head tax, advocated less complex and divisive
issues that made it higher up on the Tory priority list.

Madon said she appreciates the launching
of the judicial inquiry, although she said family members deserve at least as
much credit as politicians for pushing the matter.

Wong,
84, is more effusive, saying that Harper and his lead MP on the redress issue,
Multiculturalism Minister Jason Kenney, showed far more respect for the
community than their predecessors. Wong should know. In 2005 he put on his old
air force uniform from the Second World War and rode his Honda Goldwing motorcycle from Victoria
to Ottawa to
push the redress case.

But
he couldn't get closer than a few metres from
then-prime minister Paul Martin before being “pounced” on by RCMP
security.

Wong
said Thursday the Harper government's apology and redress package involving
$20,000 cheques which went to surviving head tax
payers or their surviving widows of payers, was a “huge”
breakthrough.

“But
that's just the first step,” he said, stressing that $20,000 cheques should go to the families of each of the more than
80,000 Chinese immigrants who paid the charge imposed between 1885 and 1923.

Those
four issues were far from the only ones sure to be brought back under the
spotlight if the minority government falls and an election is triggered.

poneil@png.canwest.com

CHECKLIST
OF KEY B.C. PROMISES:

FULFILLED


Appoint an independent judicial inquiry into the Air India bombing of June 23,
1985.


Freeze the sale of the Ridley Island Coal Terminal in
Prince Rupert .


Apologize and provide financial redress for victims of racist Canadian laws
aimed at Chinese immigrants.

(note:
Only surviving headtax payers and spouses were offereded ex-gratia
payments, meaning only 0.05% of 81,000 head tax certificates were being
honoured.  The sons, daughters and grandchildren of pre-deceased
head tax payers are being purposefully ignored and excluded. – Todd
Wong )


Offer financial help to Victoria
to stop dumping raw sewage into the Juan de Fuca Strait.


“Protect” B.C.'s softwood lumber industry, a commitment which led to
a controversial settlement of the longstanding trade dispute with the
U.S.


Invest $100 million a year for 10 years in the fight against the pine beetle
epidemic in B.C. forests. (That money was committed in the 2006 budget, though
Harper acknowledged Wednesday that the money has been slow in getting to B.C.
projects.)


Deliver at least the five-year federal funding commitment of $591 million for
the Pacific Gateway Initiative. The government has committed $1 billion over
eight years.

NOT
FULFILLED YET


Initiate an independent judicial inquiry into the collapse of the sockeye
salmon stocks on the Fraser
River .


Establish a regular army presence in B.C.


Review CMHC's handling of construction regulations
and leaky condos. Harper said during the campaign that he'd consider
compensation if the review proved federal responsibility for the widespread
moisture damage caused by flawed construction. Tory MP John Cummins, who helped
convince Harper to include the promise, has uncovered internal documents
suggesting the condo crisis was caused by federal National Building Code
regulations of the late 1970s and early 1980s.


Give British Columbia
additional seats to achieve fair representation in the House of Commons and
give the province “more equitable representation in the Senate.”

Harper
hasn't taken any steps to accelerate the next redistribution of seats in the House,
which is expected in 2014, and has actually opposed a bid by two senators to
pass a motion calling for more Senate seats for Western
Canada .


Require mandatory prison sentences for convicted operators of marijuana growing
operations and crystal meth labs. (The government has
delayed the legislation due to resistance from opposition parties, but has
promised a bill on the matter this spring.)

© The
Vancouver Sun 2007


Head Tax cheque finally ready for Mrs. Der; PM & Kenney to apologize to family

Head Tax cheque finally ready for Mrs. Der; PM & Kenney to apologize to family

It's
sad to think that it took the death of the oldest surviving head tax
spouse to galvinize the Conservative Government and Heritage Canada
into action over the long-delayed ex-gratia payments to head tax
spouses. 

I know that many of my colleagues in
the head tax redress movement are greatly saddened this past week by
the passing of both Mrs Quon Chung Shee Der in Vancouver and Mr. Ralph
Lee in Toronto.  From coast to coast, people have been recalling
stories of Mrs. Der climbing 2 flights of stairs to attend an
information meeting back in November 2005, or of Mr. Lee wheeling
around parliament in his wheelchair on June 22, 2006 – the of the
parliamentary apology. 

While many of us were too young
to have been born during the time of head tax or exclusion act
(1885-1947), we have heard many of our parents and grandparents tell
their stories or refuse to talk about hard times and racism.  We
have seen the younger generation rise up during the 1980's asking for
head tax redress.

It's
already been a few months since my own grandmother and her sister
received acknowledgement that their spousal claims had been
received.  And that was after months of spouses asking how and
when they could claim.  The problems were that Heritage Canada and
the bureaucrats and their lawyers couldn't agree on how to
proceed.  They harangued over the definition of spouse.  They
wondered about the possibility of multiple wives.  They questioned
how and if conjugal relations defined a spouse.

Der
family friends and head tax activists Daniel and Cynthia Lee first
learned of Mrs. Der's passing and immediately left voice and e-mail
messages for Mr. Kenney, PM Stephen Harper, Libby Davies, Jas Johal of
Global National TV and other friends. They also contacted Heritage
Canada to ask if her cheque could be processed immediately.  In
the chinese tradition of burning fake paper money so the deceased could
take it with them to the after-life, the Der family wished that Mrs.
Der could take a photocopy of the head tax cheque to show her deceased
husband.  It was Daniel and Cynthia Lee, as well as CCNC
National Chair Sid Tan that were interviewed by Global News on Sunday
morning – not former Liberal MLA  Patrick Wong, who is claiming
that he pursuaded Jason Kenney and Prime Minister Harper to send a
letter of apology to the Der family.

This is the first time many
of the head tax activists have heard the name Patrick Wong associated
with head tax. Patrick Wong has not ever been seen at any of the
previous head tax rallies, meetings or protests over the past two
years.  It would have been nice if Wong had offered to the Der
family to help them, but I have only heard of Wong calling media
outlets telling them that he had played a role in asking Jason Kenney
and Prime Minister Harper to write an apology letter to the Der
family.  Hopefully Wong can become a positive advocate for the
continued redress of all head tax certificates with refunds to
descendants whose parents and grandparents predeceased the Conservative
apology and redress program before they could see repayment, and not
just a political opportunist at the time of passing sorrow.

The following is from www.chineseinvancouver.blogspot.com

Cheque finally ready for Mrs Der; PM, Kenney to apologize to family


Following the death of the oldest surviving head tax spouse Mrs Quon Chung Shee Der (謝關仲樹), who was regretful for not being able to see the head tax refund cheque the minute before she died, the federal government now says her cheque has been approved and will be mailed to her family before her funeral.

Patrick
Wong, a former BC Liberal MLA who is now seeking Tory nomination in
Richmond, claimed he was touched by Mrs Der's story and had persuaded
PM Stephen Harper and minister of state for multiculturalism Jason
Kenney to write an apology letter to Mrs Der's family for the delay of
the cheque.

At first, Mrs Der's friends and family thought the
cheque would not arrive for another while and asked Heritage Canada to
issue a fake compensation cheque to be buried with Mrs Der. They knew
Mrs Der would want to carry the cheque to meeting her husband in
heaven, who paid the head tax.

A source
with the government said Mrs Der's cheque has been approved for some
time. It was only waiting to be signed. The bureaucratic red tape was
the main reason for the delay. Bureaucrats have been debating whether
“conjugal partners” should be compensated.

However, formal
marriage registration wasn't the norm during the 1900s among the
Chinese. But the bureaucrats were insisting on the technical debate.

Critics have been saying that it took much longer for the head tax spouses than the payers to get the compensation cheques.

Heritage
Canada yesterday said processing of the first batch of head tax
spouses' applications is now complete and cheques will be mailed out in
a short while.

Mrs. Der, oldest living head tax spouse, dies without head tax refund

Mrs. Der, oldest living head tax spouse, dies without head tax refund

Mrs Quon Chung Shee Der
(謝關仲樹), 102, died last Friday,  Daniel Lee, fellow head tax
activist told me on Sunday morning.  Daniel and his wife Cynthia
were family friends and had visited her earlier in the week.  Mrs. Der
had by default, become the oldest living head tax spouse.  She had
been an active senior in the redress campaign.

I remember when Mrs. Der came to the November 20, 2005 meeting. 
Everybody applauded when she was introduced.  She climbed 2
flights of stairs, with two men helping her because she WANTED to be at
the meeting.  She was more than just feisty.  She kept asking
“When is the government going give me my husband's money back?” 
Okay… she said it in Chinese.

This was at the planning and information meeting prior to our historic Nov 27 Chinese Head Tax: Protest in Vancouver Chinatown
Mrs. Der and many other people vocalized the pent-up frustration of
having justice denied for generations.  It's more than just a
simple wrongful but legal at the time monetary issue.  Mrs.
Der  really understood the issue as moral too.  The Canadian
government made an unfair tax.  It was a racially motivated tax against
only people of Chinese ancestry, and meant to deter Chinese immigration
to Canada..  In 1923, they changed it to an act of outright
exclusion.  But in 1947, they recognized it was wrong and
recanted.  They should give the money back.

Sid
Chow Tan, CCNC National Chairperson issued the following statement of the
passing of Mrs. Quon Chung Shee Der:

On Saturday,
I learned of the passing of Mrs. Quon Chung Shee Der, who at 102 was one of the
oldest surviving matriarchs of the head tax families. On behalf of the Chinese
Canadian National Council, the Head Tax Families Society of Canada and the
Chinese Canadian community, I extend our deep condolences to Mrs. Der's family
and friends.

Quon
Chung Shee Der was one feisty and tenacious advocate for redress of the
Head Tax and Chinese Exclusion Act and we will miss her greatly.

My
colleagues and I will always remember Mrs. Der climbing up two flights of
stairs to attend a community meeting held on November 20, 2005. It was at this
pivotal community meeting that head tax families decided to mobilize the
community to protest the former Liberal Government's efforts to impose the
ill-fated Agreement-in-Principle. Mrs. Der stirred all of us with her simple
question: “When will the Government give me back my husband's head tax
money? She became an instant media star on that day.

Mrs.
Der made an effort to involve herself in the redress campaign. There she was on
May 25, 2006 sitting beside Prime Minister Harper when he visited with our
seniors to discuss the redress issue. The Prime Minister and Hon. Jason Kenney
pledged that she and others would not have to wait too long for redress.
However, while Mrs. Der did submit her redress application in early December
2006, unfortunately, she was unable to hang on any longer and passed away last
Friday.

The
Government has lost the opportunity to complete the redress apology with Mrs.
Der and about a dozen others who have now passed away since June 22, 2006. To
date, none of the more than 400 head tax spouses who applied have received
their redress payments. We pledge to redouble our efforts to achieve a complete
the apology for Mrs. Der and others like her. We will never forget her.”

May
she rest in peace.

History books have continued to write about the “black mark” in
the racist history of Canada.  But the government still wouldn't
apologize, or give a refund, as they do for other “tax mistakes.” 
The government did not want to have to pay for the $23 Million with interest.

But now with an acceptable “symbolic refund” and apology by Prime
Minister Stephen Harper, why is his Conservative government so
S-L-O-W?  No spouses have yet been offered ex-gratia 
payments.  Thank God, they finally gave head tax payer 
Ralph Lee
,
his cheque on March 10, before Lee passed away 5 days later at age
107.  But why wasn't Lee presented with his cheque 5 months ago
when head tax payer Charlie Quon received his?

The government has been confused and quagmired in it's definition of
“spouse” and it's refusal to acknowledge descendants as legal heirs to
head tax refunds.  

Make it simple.  One payment per certificate.  Recognize each
and every certificate.  Please do it before any more surviving
head tax payers, spouses, sons or daughters go empty handed to meet
their ancestors.

This is what the CCNC had proposed to the Conservative government when
they asked for suggestions for redress.  First stage proposals was
to Give immediate apology for Chinese Head Tax, give immediate
“symbolic” monetary redress payment to living head tax payers and
spouses.  Stage Two was to develop a plan to address “symbolic”
monetary redress payment to descendants where original head tax payers
or spouses are pre-deceased.”  To date, the Conservative govt has
not acknowledged the Stage Two proposal.

It's only been since 1984, since MP Margaret Mitchell stood in
Parliament to ask the govt for head tax redress… 23 short but long
years ago.

The following story if from Chineseinvancouver.blogspot.com

Head tax payer's spouse dies with regret


An
icon in the fight for redressing the head tax, Mrs Quon Chung Shee Der
(謝關仲樹), died at the age of 102 with the regret that the final
compensation cheque didn't reach her in time.

“My
colleagues and I will always remember Mrs. Der climbing up two flights
of stairs to attend a community meeting held on November 20, 2005. It
was at this pivotal community meeting that head tax
families decided to mobilize the community to protest the former
Liberal Government's efforts to impose the ill-fated
Agreement-in-Principle. Mrs. Der stirred all of us with her simple
question: “When will the Government give me back my husband's head tax
money? She became an instant media star on that day,” said CCNC's
national chair Sid Chow Tan.

Cynthia Lee
was Mrs Der's friend who helped her fill out the redress application
form last year when Heritage Canada announced head tax payers' spouses could apply for compensation. Mrs Der's husband paid the head tax. To her, getting the tax refund was all about having justice done.

Ever
since, Mrs Der kept asking if her application had been approved. Lee
said Mrs Der had been in anxiety for the last few months. Her health
deteriorated rapidly at the same time. She broke her arm and was
admitted to a long term care facility towards the end of last year.

Lee
questioned why the government needed so long to process applications
filed by head tax payers' spouses. It only took one month for the
payers themselves to get the checque. However, spouses have waited for
over four months and so far none have got the compensation yet.

Tan
said Mrs Der was one feisty and tenacious advocate for redress of the
Head Tax and Chinese Exclusion Act. “We will miss her greatly.”

Last
year when PM Stephen Harper met with head tax survivors in Vancouver's
Chinatown, Mrs Der sat beside Harper, so did another head tax payer
Charlie Quan (關祥國) of 99 years old.

Quan became the country's first head tax payer compensated last October.

“Mrs.
Der made an effort to involve herself in the redress campaign. There
she was on May 25, 2006 sitting beside Prime Minister Harper when he
visited with our seniors to discuss the redress issue. The Prime
Minister and Hon. Jason Kenney pledged that she and others would not
have to wait too long for redress. However, while Mrs. Der did submit
her redress application in early December 2006, unfortunately, she was
unable to hang on any longer and passed away last Friday,” Tan said in
a statement.

Tan blasts the Tory government for having lost the
opportunity to complete the redress apology with Mrs. Der and about a
dozen others who have now passed away since June 22, 2006.

Ralph Lee, 107, was oldest to pay head tax – passes away 5 days after receiving cheque

Ralph Lee, 107, was oldest to pay head tax – passes away 5 days after receiving cheque

Ralph Kung Kee Lee
passed away only five days after receiving his ex-gratia payment from
the Canadian government.  In 2006, Lee was the oldest activist
asking the government to make a sympbolic return of head tax money
charged only to immigrants of Chinese ancestry.  It seemed like
only days ago, that the Conservative government had a photo op with Mr.
Lee.

Unfortunately the same cannot be said for Mrs. Der – the
oldest living head tax spouse who passed away in Vancouver on Friday
evening.  Back in December 2005, the 101-year old Mrs. Der climbed
2 flights of stairs to attend a meeting organized by the BC Coalition
of Head Tax Payers, Spouses and Families.  In early 2006, Mrs. Der
met with both MP Jason Kenney, and Prime Minister Steven Harper – who
both promised her  quick action for giving immediate symbolic
repayment for surviving head tax payers and spouses.

Due to poor heath on June 22, 2006. Mrs. Der was unable to attend the
ceremonies at the Vancouver Hotel, for the simulcast apology
announcement by Prime Minister Harper.  Mrs. Der was also unable
to attend the Oct ceremony of the first head tax ex-gratia payment
given to Charlie Quon in Vancouver.

Below are stories about Ralph Lee from the media.

Chinese immigrant, 107, was oldest to pay head tax

Last Updated: Monday, March 19, 2007 | 5:29 PM ET

CBC News

Three generations of Ralph Lung Kee Lee's family gathered
for a memorial in Toronto Monday to say goodbye to the oldest member of
the Chinese-Canadian community to have paid the head tax.

Lee died at his residence in Pickering, Ont., on
Thursday, five days after celebrating his 107th birthday.

Ralph Lee, at 106, carrying the symbolic 'last spike' used in the completion of the Canadian Pacific Railway, arrives in Ottawa aboard the 'Redress Express' in 2006.Ralph Lee, at 106, carrying the symbolic 'last spike'
used in the completion of the Canadian Pacific Railway, arrives in
Ottawa aboard the 'Redress
Express' in 2006.

(Canadian Press)

“I'll miss him being around in terms of honouring
our ancestors, having the traditions passed down through the community,”
his granddaughter Lindy Anderson
said, fighting back tears.

Born March 10, 1900 in China's Guangdong province, he
immigrated to Canada at the age of 12 and moved to the northern Ontario
community then known as Fort William, now the city of Thunder Bay.
 
He spent five years working as a dishwasher there in order to pay off the $500
head tax he was forced to pay upon entering
Canada .

All Chinese immigrants entering
Canada from 1885 to 1923 had a head
tax imposed on them, with the intention of deterring Chinese immigration after
Chinese workers helped build the Canadian Pacific Railway in 1885.

A symbol of community's history

Lee later worked at maintaining the railway a previous
generation of Chinese labourers had helped to build.

To many in the Chinese-Canadian
community, Lee represents the history of Chinese immigration to this
country, said Colleen Hua, president of the Chinese Canadian National Council.

“What they see him as symbolizing is a person who,
although excluded, still persevered and worked through it and lived to the very
end to make sure that he saw an end to the exclusion and the redress,” Hua
said.

Lee returned to China
and found a wife before returning to
Canada .

But because the Chinese Exclusion Act prohibited Chinese
immigrants from bringing their families to
Canada , Lee's wife and son were
unable to join him. By the time the act was lifted in 1947, his son had died
during the Second World War.

Eventually, his wife and two daughters were brought to
Canada
to live with him.

Lee later started his own business importing and exporting
goods from China .

Joined 'Redress Express' journey

He participated in another historic chapter for the
Chinese-Canadian community when he was one of several head-taxpayers who
travelled to Ottawa from
Vancouver  in 2006 on a train dubbed the
“Redress Express.”

At the end of the journey on June 21, Prime Minister
Stephen Harper formally apologized for the fact that the head tax had been
imposed and promised symbolic payments to those who were affected.

Lee, who was 106 at the time, carried the symbolic
“last spike” given to the Chinese community by author Pierre Berton
in recognition of work done by immigrants to build the railway.

He is survived by two daughters, seven grandchildren and
12 great-grandchildren.

Of an estimated 80,000 Chinese immigrants who paid the
tax, about 30 remain alive, as well as several hundred widows of men who paid
the tax.

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/toronto/story/2007/03/19/headtax-obit.html

 

 

Family hopes memory and legacy of centenarian
head-tax payer lives on

 

Allison Jones

Canadian Press


Monday, March 19, 2007

 

TORONTO (CP) –
Ralph Lung Kee Lee has earned a place in Canadian history books as the oldest
Chinese head-tax payer to accept the government's official apology and redress,
and his family said Monday at his memorial service they hope his story lives on
long after his death.

Lee
received his $20,000 redress cheque from Ottawa
on March 10, his 107th birthday – just five days before he died.

“It
was almost like, 'I waited this long, here I am. I'm going to stay alive to get
it,”' Lee's daughter Linda Ing said of her father, who received his
apology and compensation 94 years after coming to Canada.

Born
in 1900, Lee came to Canada
when he was 12 and paid the $500 head tax imposed on all Chinese immigrants
between 1885 and 1923.

He
returned to China to marry
and fathered three children, but the Exclusion Act prevented him from bringing
his family to Canada .

After
the Exclusion Act was lifted in 1947, Lee was finally able to reunite with his
family in Canada .
For Ing, who was then 12, it was the first time she had ever laid eyes on her
father.

On
June 22, Lee was the oldest of six surviving head-tax payers who saw Prime
Minister Stephen Harper deliver the government's official apology.

Lee
had a fun and loving personality, Ing said, and he was quite tickled when he
finally received his redress cheque.

“I
said, 'You're going to be 107,”' Ing recalled telling her father the day
before his birthday.

“He
said, 'Me?' I said, 'You,”' Ing said in mock wide-eyed amazement.
“'You're going to get your cheque.' And he just laughed.”

Ing
said when she was younger, she didn't appreciate the sacrifices her father
made.

“It
was in one ear and out the other,” she said.

Ing's
son Leo said now that Lee is gone, it's important for those who remember his
story to pass it on so his legacy never dies.

“As
we move on, the younger generation has to look back and to look at people like
grandpa and think (about) why we came here, what we've accomplished here,”
he said.

“One
day I won't be here to speak, so I want to make sure that grandpa has passed
the torch on to the younger generation. I want the younger generation to
realize where they came from, to be proud to be Chinese.”

Lee's
granddaughter Landy Anderson said she is extremely proud to tell people about
her grandfather and her connection to Canadian history.

“It's
really hard to talk about grandpa without referring to the head tax, since my
entire family history revolves around this event,” she said, adding even
though Lee had to overcome years of adversity and racism, he was a loving soul
who doted on his family.

Lee
is survived by two daughters, seven grandchildren and 12 great-grandchildren.

© The
Canadian Press 2007



http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=4b839cd4-e837-4ecf-89e9-8b999df7d253&k=66676

 

******************************

Victor Wong

CCNC Executive Director

national@ccnc.ca

(416) 977-9871 (tel)

(416) 977-1630 (fax)

CCNC: www.ccnc.ca

PanAsian Network: www.ccnc.ca/panasian

Health Equity Network: www.ccnc.ca/health

“Remembering the contributions of the Head
Tax payers, Chinese railway workers and their families.”

Oldest Surviving Chinese Head Tax Subject Gets Compensation

Oldest Surviving Chinese Head Tax Subject Gets
Compensation

The oldest surviving head tax payer received his ex-gratia payment on Saturday March 10th.  Ralph
Lung Kee Lee is 107 years old.  Amazing that he was able to live
this long despite the hardships faced by Chinese pioneers in Canada, as
well as the systemic racism which included denial of citizenship,
naturalization and voting rights.

Victor Wong, executive director of the Chinese Canadian National
Council gives an account of the event attended by CCNC president
Colleen Hua.  The event was covered by Citynews in Toronto.

It was an emotional moment for all of
us who were present at the cheque presentation
yesterday for Ralph Lung Kee Lee. Those of you who
went to Ottawa
on June 22, 2006 will remember Mr. Lee wheeling around Parliament and at our
banquet that evening. He was one of 6 HT payers to receive an apology personally
from PM Stephen Harper that day. Mr. Lee turned 107 yesterday and he is one of
the oldest HT payers, if not the oldest surviving HT payer.  And there he was surrounded by a huge
extended family. MP Colin Carrie presented the cheque
(and received the 30-second lobby on inclusive redress from each of us).
Colleen, George and Doug spoke. Landy, Mr. Lee’s granddaughter, was the MC. We
had a huge feast c/o Bright Pearl and the story was covered by City TV and
various local and Chinese papers.

There’s another cheque presentation tomorrow in
Calgary …good luck to
Teresa and crew. There is an event on the book about the Three Chinese
Cuban-Generals in Vancouver today and tomorrow,
and in Montreal on March 17th and
Toronto on March
25th where we will be talking about HT redress (check below for more
details).

Cheers, Victor

Oldest Surviving Chinese Head Tax Subject Gets Compensation

Watch

Video News Director Watch

Oldest Surviving Chinese Head Tax Subject Gets Compensation

Saturday March 10, 2007

Saturday was Ralph Lee's 107th birthday, but for the Canadian, who just
happens to also be the oldest surviving subject of Canada 's infamous
Chinese head tax, it was also the day he finally got the compensation
and apology he'd waited so many years for.

“Apart from the fact that I'm happy that grandpa's alive to receive the
apology, it's a mixture of emotions,” said grand-daughter Landy
Anderson.

Fron 1885 to 1923 Chinese immigrants in Canada were charged a head tax.
Lee himself paid $500, which at the time was two years pay for the
young man.

“When he came over here he worked pretty hard to make a living,” said daughter Faye Lee.

“He was only 12 years old and he had to work in a restaurant and wash dishes while going to school at the same time.”

Lee was one of many in attendance last June in Ottawa when the Canadian
government announced both the compensation and released an apology for
the tax and the ensuing 24-year ban on Chinese immigration.

“On behalf of the people and government of Canada we offer a full
apology to Chinese Canadians for the head tax and express our deepest
sorrow for the subsequent exclusion of Chinese immigrants,” Prime
Minister Stephen Harper said that day.

That apology came with a $20,000 settlement offered to surviving head
tax subjects or their spouses, though for some of their descendents
that's nowhere near enough.

“It's a wonderful thing that there was an apology, and that redress has
been given to surviving head tax payers and spouses, but this really
only represents 0.6 per cent of the people who really suffered,” said
attendee Colleen Hua.

Currently only about 500 Chinese Canadians are eligible for the
compensation. If the offer were extended to the families of those who
paid the head tax – 3,000 people would be eligible.

The Chinese Head Tax

http://www.citynews.ca/news/news_8644.aspx

Vancouver Province: Paying head tax families is a just remedy – letters to the editor

Vancouver Province: Paying head tax families is a just remedy – letters to the editor

Some letters
on HT redress in the Vancouver
Province from Monday, February 26th, 2007.

The
first letter is by my friend Sid Tan, a long-time community activist
and advocate for head tax redress.  While his friend Charlie Quon
was the the first person to receive the head tax ex-gratia payment –
Sid's grandmother died in 2002, so she and the family will not receive
a payment.  Neither will Gim Wong, the Canadian born WW2 veteran
whose father paid the head tax, but died a long time ago.  It was
Gim who saluted the Prime Minister from the public gallery when Harper
made the apology in Parliament, in Ottawa.

The second person is from a non-head tax descendant who doesn't understand how redress works. 

Head
tax redress issues have been an open sore on Canada's racist history
for far too long.  It needs to be treated.  The best health
care is always preventative.  Programs for the  prevention of
racism sometimes don't seem effective and a waste of money – but when
racism happens, it costs a lot, and everybody pays for it – sometimes
for generations.

If
head tax money had not been made mandatory – 81,000 Chinese migrants to
Canada could have paid for their health and dental care, homes to live
in, brought their wives and children to Canada, helped to send children
and grandchildren
to university (after universities allowed Chinese to attend) – and all
the things most Canadians take for granted, unless you are barred by
racism.

The
present head tax redress program by Conservative government is only
giving ex-gratia payments to individuals for living head tax payers or
spouses.  This means only 381 certificates from a total of 81,000
certificates are being recognized… less than 0.5%.  That's like
putting a band-aid on a completely burned leg.  Where's the justce
for the other 99.5%?

And redress advocacy groups are only asking for a “symbolic return” – not full tax refund with interest!

See below for the Vancouver Province letters:

Paying head-tax families is a just remedy

Paying
head-tax families is a just remedy

 Prime Minister Stephen Harper presents Chinese head-tax survivor Ralph Lee with a government apology. Now, families of those who paid the tax want compensation payments of $20,000 each.

Prime Minister Stephen
Harper presents Chinese head-tax survivor Ralph Lee with a government apology.
Now, families of those who paid the tax want compensation payments of $20,000
each.

Photograph by : The Canadian Press

Paying head-tax families is a just remedy

Letter to Editor

Vancouver
Province

February 26, 2007, A17 

The
families of Chinese head-tax payers are seeking what every Canadian would want
— a refund of an unjust tax.

No amount
of money could compensate for the hardship and loneliness of 62 years of unjust
legislated tax and exclusion against these families The federal government was
unjustly enriched by the collection of $23 million in head tax, of which the
B.C. government received an estimated $9 million.

The
federal government's message with its imposed settlement was: “The
government was wrong. We're sorry but we're keeping the money. Too bad your
parents or grandparents didn't live long enough. Take it or leave it.” Of
course, head-tax families believe it isn't over until we say it's over. We say
it isn't over.

If the
government unjustly takes a dollar from my family or me and apologizes, does
that mean it doesn't have to give the dollar back? Prime Minister Stephen
Harper and the Conservative government have shown a great deal of political
acumen and finesse on this file. Unfortunately, it now appears to be simply
pandering for votes, while neglecting the matter of justice and honour for head-tax families.

The prime
minister said the Chinese head tax and exclusion were morally wrong.

If that's
the case, shouldn't he do the morally right thing?

Sid Chow
Tan, Chinese Canadian National Council

Hospitals before head tax

Letter to Editor

The Province

February 26, 2007, A17 

I am sick
and tired of hearing about head-tax compensation.

The
government that we have now did not implement the head tax, and therefore
should not have to compensate anyone.

I don't
understand why government after government keeps apologizing, when they weren't
the ones who levied the head tax.

And for
those people who are trying to collect head-tax compensation because their
relatives had to pay it, they're just trying to get money from the government.

The government
could be using the money they have paid to expand emergency facilities in
hospitals, which is far more important.

Courtnee Anderson, Coquitlam

CBC News: Expand head-tax payments, Chinese group says

Expand head-tax payments, Chinese group says

Last Updated: Monday, February 19, 2007 | 7:13 PM ET

CBC
News

The federal government should expand head-tax payments to
include families of the Chinese immigrants who paid the tax, the Chinese
Canadian National Council said Monday.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced last June
that the government would make “symbolic” head-tax payments of
$20,000 to roughly 400 people who paid the tax, or their widows. He also made
a formal apology to Chinese Canadians.

But now the Chinese-Canadian group wants the
payments extended to cover roughly 3,000 families who paid the tax. It wants to
meet the government to discuss expanding the payments.

“We are hopeful that the Canadian government will
build on the partial achievements last year,” Colleen Hua, president,
said in a recent posting on the council's website. “We call on Prime
Minister Harper to restore dignity to all head-tax families and extend payments
to those families where the head-tax payer and spouse have both passed
away.”

The tax, a discriminatory measured aimed only at Chinese
immigrants, was imposed from 1885 to 1923, while the Dominion of
Newfoundland had a similar tax between 1906 and 1949, before it joined Confederation.

It was imposed to deter Chinese immigration after
Chinese workers helped finish the Canadian Pacific Railway in 1885.

The tax started at $50 per person in 1885 and rose to $500 per person in 1903,
equal to as much as two years' salary.

After it was withdrawn in 1923, the head tax was replaced
by the Exclusion Act, which barred Chinese immigrants from the country
altogether until 1947.

With files from the Canadian
Press

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2007/02/19/head-tax.html

Canadian Press: Families owed head-tax reparations, activists say

Families owed head-tax reparations, activists say

Chinese-Canadian group wants settlement expanded beyond
surviving immigrants

Canadian Press

TORONTO — The federal government should
provide compensation to the families of Chinese immigrants who paid a
discriminatory head tax, a group of Chinese-Canadian activists said yesterday.

Currently, only surviving head-tax payers or their
spouses are eligible to claim a $20,000 settlement from the Conservative
government, which formally apologized last June for the head tax and the
subsequent 24-year ban on immigration from
China .

But compensation should be extended to the families of
deceased head-tax payers who also suffered as a result of the policy, the
Chinese Canadian National Council said.

That could expand the number of Chinese-Canadian
families eligible for the redress from 500 to 3,000, the group estimates.

NDP MP Olivia Chow and the group have asked to meet
with the government to address the issue.

But Multiculturalism Minister Jason Kenney wouldn't
commit to negotiations, saying the government maintains an “open
dialogue” with the Chinese-Canadian community.

“The government's made its decision on redress,
and I don't see the cabinet reconsidering that,” he said in an interview
from Ottawa .
“But there's always room for creative thoughts.”

About 81,000 immigrants paid the head tax, which was
imposed on Chinese immigrants entering
Canada from 1885 until 1923. The
tax was set at $50 when it was first imposed in 1885, and in 1903 it rose to
$500 — the equivalent of two years wages.

Newfoundland also imposed a head tax from 1906
to 1949, ending in the year it joined Confederation.

When Prime Minister Stephen Harper made the formal
apology last summer, Chinese-Canadian groups had hoped the government would
also compensate first-generation children of the head-tax payers.

But the government decided to limit it to those most
directly affected, Mr. Kenney said.

The activists argue that
Canada 's policies toward Chinese
immigrants caused their children to suffer as well, dividing families across
continents and leaving many in poverty while the immigrants struggled to pay
off debts incurred by the tax.

Doug Hum said it took his father and uncle more than
10 years to pay off the $1,000 debt they incurred to cover the head taxes they
paid upon arriving in Canada
in 1912.

They managed to save enough money to return to
China and marry, but couldn't bring their wives
to Canada
under the Exclusion Act, which came into effect in 1923.

“There is a grievous injustice here,” Mr.
Hum said.

“The tax belongs to the families, and it should
be returned. Whole families were affected. Many had to beg, borrow from other
family members to get here.”

While the government acknowledges their suffering, Mr.
Kenney said it had to “draw the line somewhere” when deciding on a
compensation package.

“Part of our concern, quite frankly, is that many
families in this country have suffered hardship or injustice or discrimination,
and we don't want to create social divisions where people start comparing or
compensating each other through their tax dollars for the sufferings of their
parents or grandparents,” he said.

“We are concerned that could undermine social
cohesion in this country, and we want this whole experience of redress for the
Chinese head tax to be a unifying and educational experience.”

Mr. Kenney also said the council's position on
compensating families of head-tax payers isn't representative of the majority
of the Chinese-Canadian community.

In addition to the apology and compensation package,
Mr. Kenney said the government plans to honour the memory of head-tax
immigrants by spending at least $2.5-million on a program to educate Canadians
about that period of history.

The money is part of a $24-million fund the government
announced last June to establish a historical recognition program to provide
grants and contributions to communities for commemorative projects dealing with
past immigration restrictions and war measures that affected many segments of
the population.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20070220.HEADTAX20/TPStory/National

 

Families seek head tax settlement

A
group of Chinese- Canadians says the tax affected entire families.

By CP

TORONTO — The federal
government should provide compensation to the families of Chinese immigrants
who paid a discriminatory head tax, a group of Chinese- Canadian activists said
yesterday.

Currently,
only surviving head-tax payers or their spouses are eligible to claim a $20,000
settlement from the Conservative government, which formally apologized last
June for the tax and the subsequent 24-year ban on immigration from
China .

But
compensation should be extended to the families of deceased head-tax payers who
also suffered as a result of the policy, said the Chinese Canadian National
Council.

That
could expand the number of Chinese-Canadian families eligible for the redress
from 500 to 3,000, the group estimates.

NDP
MP Olivia Chow and the group have asked to meet with the government to address
the issue.

But
Jason Kenney, the secretary of state for multiculturalism, wouldn't commit to
negotiations, saying the government maintains an “open dialogue” with
the Chinese-Canadian community.

“The
government's made its decision on redress and I don't see the cabinet
reconsidering that,” he said in an interview from
Ottawa . “But there's always room for
creative thoughts.”

About
81,000 immigrants paid the head tax, which was imposed on Chinese immigrants
entering Canada
from 1885 until 1923. The tax was set at $50 when it was first imposed in 1885
and in 1903 it rose to $500 — the equivalent of two years' wages.
Newfoundland also
imposed a head tax from 1906 to 1949, the year it joined Confederation.

When
Prime Minister Stephen Harper made the formal apology last summer,
Chinese-Canadian groups had hoped the government would also compensate first-
generation children of the head-tax payers.

But
the government decided to limit it to those most directly affected, Kenney
said.

The
activists argue that Canada 's
immigration policies towards Chinese immigrants caused their children to suffer
as well, dividing families across continents and leaving many in poverty while
the immigrants struggled to pay off debts incurred by the tax.

“The
tax belongs to the families and it should be returned,” said Doug Hum.

http://lfpress.ca/newsstand/News/National/2007/02/20/pf-3647064.html

Globe & Mail: Ottawa urged to expand head-tax redress

Ottawa urged to expand head-tax redress

Globe and Mail update

TORONTO
— The Chinese Canadian National Council (CCNC) is calling for an
expansion of the current federal redress program for Chinese immigrants who
paid a discriminatory head tax upon entry into Canada.At a press conference
Monday in Toronto, members of the council and the Ontario Coalition of Head Tax
Payers and Families said the families of those who paid the head tax should be
eligible for compensation.

Currently, only surviving head-tax payers and their
spouses can claim the $20,000 settlement announced by the government in June
2006.

“We have formed a consensus right across
Canada
… that the redress is not complete,” said CCNC executive director
Victor Wong.

“The head tax impacted on the entire family
– this is the concept that the government fails to understand.”

The council says that as many as 3,000 families are
excluded from the federal payments, which began after Prime Minister Stephen
Harper made a formal apology to Chinese-Canadians last June for the head tax
that was imposed on Chinese immigrants entering
Canada from 1885 to 1923.

NDP MP Olivia Chow put forth a private members' motion
Feb. 14 in the House of Commons urging the government to recognize that the
redress agreement is incomplete and to commit to negotiations with families of
head-tax payers to offer them similar compensation to that of payers' spouses.

“What's happened is that only 5 per cent –
that is, the head tax payers and spouse – receive redress,” Ms.
Chow told the press conference via telephone from
Ottawa , speaking in English and Cantonese.
“Given that a year ago the Prime Minister promised to have complete
redress and an apology, and so far, only the apology and a partial redress [has
happened]…. We need to impress upon them that justice is not done as
yet.”

Ms. Chow suggested that the matter could develop into
a hot-button issue during the next federal election.

Several direct descendents of head-tax payers spoke of
the hardship suffered by their families as a result of the discriminatory
practice.

Student Eric Yam, 14, a second-generation
Chinese-Canadian, never knew his grandparents. His grandfather arrived in
Canada in 1923 and was sent to a detention
centre in Victoria
when he couldn't pay all of the head tax. After marrying in
China in 1930, Yam's grandfather had to leave
his wife and daughter behind upon returning to
Canada due to the Chinese Exclusion
Act of 1923. Tam's father was born years later, but had to quit school at 17 to
support his aging parents.

“The only memory I have of them is the suffering
they faced,” Mr. Yam said. “Even after all these years, the effect
of the head tax is still being felt. My father never got to go to school.
First-generation sons and daughters should receive a refund from the federal
government – it is only fair.”

Educator Rebecca Tam broke down in tears explaining
how her mother never met her own father, who couldn't afford to bring his
family to Canada
thanks to the head tax. Ms. Tam expressed surprise at how
“speedily” Ottawa dealt with the
case of Maher Arar, the Canadian who was imprisoned and tortured in
Syria
for nearly a year.

“The government is paying lip service to the
descendents of head tax victims,” Ms. Tam said. “Chinese-Canadians
are once again being sidelined. Mr. Arar, one person, suffered for one year …
in the Chinese community, we had 80,000 head-tax payers and their families who
suffered.”

Binh Chow, co-vice-chair of the Ontario Coalition of
Head Tax Payers and Families (OCHTPF), noted that the $23-million in head taxes
paid by Chinese immigrants is worth billions today even without factoring in
accumulation of interest. As for government concerns that extending redress to
families of head-tax payers would open the floodgates for applications, Mr.
Chow said only those descendents born after 1947, when the exclusion act was repealed,
would be eligible.

Over 80,000 immigrants paid the head tax, which ranged
from $50 to $500 over the years. Newfoundland
also imposed a head tax from 1906 to 1949, the year it joined Confederation.

Chinese-Canadians have been lobbying the government for
the past two decades, with over 4000 families registering with the CCNC since
1984.

About 500 families are eligible for compensation under
the current government plan, but thousands more have turned in head-tax
certificates and other paperwork that could serve as documentation for any
claims, Mr. Wong said, adding that the coalition hasn't yet determined what
they think the exact criteria for eligibility should be, but is keen to enter
discussions with the government.

But Multiculturalism Minister Jason Kenney wouldn't
commit to negotiations, saying the government maintains an “open
dialogue” with the Chinese-Canadian community.

“The government's made its decision on redress,
and I don't see the cabinet reconsidering that,” he told Canadian Press.

While the government acknowledges the suffering of
Chinese families, Mr. Kenney said it had to “draw the line
somewhere” when deciding on a compensation package.

“Part of our concern, quite frankly, is that
many families in this country have suffered hardship or injustice or
discrimination, and we don't want to create social divisions where people start
comparing or compensating each other through their tax dollars for the
sufferings of their parents or grandparents,” he said.

But the Chinese experience is “unique,”
said Maria Chan, vice-president of the Chinese Community Centre of Ontario.

“It was the role that the Chinese played that
made Canada
possible,” said co-vice-chair Doug Hum of the OCHTPF, referring to how
Chinese workers helped build the national railroad. “The tax belongs to
the families and it should be returned. Whole families were affected. Many had
to beg, borrow from other family members to get here.”

With files from Canadian
Press

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070219.wheadtax0219/BNStory/National/home

 

Chinese Head Tax: Chan was missing… now Chan is found and demanding an apology…

Chinese Head Tax: Chan was missing… now Chan is found and demanding an apology…

Where
has Raymond Chan been during the Head Tax apology?  Why did he NOT
congratulate the head tax redress groups for being able to receive what
he and his government could not give them. 

Why has he
NOT been criticizing the government for leaving hundreds of thousands
of Chinese head tax descendants out in the cold, while less than 0.6%
of head tax certificates are recognized and honoured with symbolic
redress payments?

Why did Raymond Chan NOT seek the 2nd legal
opinion that David Emerson, Stephen Owen and Ujjal Dosanjh were able to
find?  I spoke to Ujjal during the Dec 2005 campaign, and he said
that an apology in Parliament would cost nothing, and there would be no
liability. 

During the Dec 2005 election campaign –
Raymond apologized to me personally for not being able to give what we
were asking for – apology + one payment per certificate.

The
Liberals such as Chan and Hedy Fry were blindly following previous 1994
policy decisions of Sheila Finestone who said “We wish we could rewrite
history. We wish we could relive the past. We cannot…We believe our
only choice lies in using limited government resources to create a more
equitable society now and a better future for generations to come.
Therefore, the government will not grant financial compensation for the
requests made.”

Finestone said that statememt because cabinet
would not pay compensation… All the head tax money that had been
collected… had already long been spent.

Our government should NOT profit from racism.

Cabinets
change, Governments change, Ministers change.  It takes political
will and leadership to make the decisions that resulted in the 1988
Japanese Canadian Redress, even though they went through a number of
ministers to get it done.

The Conservatives are in power now
(albeit in a minority govt), and Jason Kenney is the new Secretary of
State for Multiculturalism (Raymond Chan's old post).  Kenney has
been going through files and memos and recetnly stated that Chan misled
the public about the liabilities of head tax redress.  Chan said
Kenney is wrong and has since demanded Kenny apologize to him.

 


Chan demands apology from Tory minister

Peter O'Neil

Vancouver Sun

Thursday, February 15, 2007
OTTAWA
— Former Liberal multiculturalism minister Raymond Chan rose in Parliament
today to demand an apology from a Conservative minister who accused Chan of
misleading Chinese-Canadians on the head tax controversy.

He
directed his appeal to Multiculturalism Minister Jason Kenney, who alleged in
the House of Commons last year that Chan was falsely warning Canadians that a
head tax apology would expose the federal government to potential costly
lawsuits.

Chan
has cited internal documents obtained by The Vancouver Sun, dating from
mid-2004 to early 2006, after the Conservatives formed government, warning of potential legal problems.

“The
minister of multiculturalism must come clean and apologize to this House, to
Canadians and in particular to the Chinese-Canadian community for misleading
them,” Chan ( Richmond )
said in a statement.

Kenney,
who said earlier this week he had no intention of apologizing, couldn’t
be reached for comment.

Chan,
in a telephone conference call, said later he and the Liberal party now support
Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s apology and promise to provide $20,000 cheques to surving payers of the
racist head tax. The same payments are also going to widows of deceased payers.

Chan
said he always tried to develop a “collective” position, and noted
that Tory MPs Inky Mark and Bev Oda both supported the former Liberal
government’s refusal to apologize and offer individual redress.

He
said all four parties are backing redress now even though there still are legal
concerns that other ethnic groups, as well as Chinese-Canadians not eligible
for the redress cheques, could use the policy to file
challenges under the Charter of Rights.

“If
everybody can handle that legal issue I don’t have to be opposing to that
decision,” Chan said.

“That
concern is always been there. I think that people are making decisions with
that in their mind.”

Kenney,
when he was Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s parliamentary secretary last
year, rose in the House of Commons to denounce Chan’s stated refusal to
apologize because of legal concerns.

“That
was the excuse, but we have since discovered, according to Access to
Information, that he received exactly the opposite advice,” Kenney said
in May, 2006, a month before the Conservative government apologized and offered
$20,000 cheques to surviving head tax payers or the
widows of deceased head tax payers.

Kenney
cited a 2004 Canadian Heritage briefing note to Chan which listed numerous
groups, including Chinese Canadians, that might seek redress measures similar
to the $422 million package given in 1988 to  victims
of the Second World War policy of interning Japanese-Canadians.

The
note stated that any claims by other ethnic groups under the Charter of Rights
for equal treatment “would have to demonstrate close parallels to the
Japanese Canadians case in order to be successful,” wrote Judith LaRocque.

“It
appears that, from a legal point of view, none of the outstanding claims would
meet this burden.”

Kenney, asked by a fellow Tory MP if Chan
had his “facts straight” on legal issues relating to head tax
redress, told MPs: “I think the member of
Richmond should apologize to Chinese
Canadians for not telling –“

(Kenney
was cut off by the Speaker before finishing his sentence.)

Chan
said today that Kenney mis-read the 2004 briefing
note.